CAGE/EHES SUMMER SCHOOL, 2017
GEOGRAPHY, INSTITUTIONS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN HISTORY
University of Warwick, 11-15 July 2017
Organisers: Stephen Broadberry and Alexander Klein
The Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy
(CAGE) at the University of Warwick and the European Historical Economics
Society (EHES) are joining together to provide a Summer School, to be held at
the University of Warwick, 11-15 July 2017. The theme of the Summer School will
be geography, institutions and economic growth in history. The aim is to
evaluate geography and institutions as competing explanations of growth
performance over the long run. The focus in the geography section of the Summer
School will be on the new economic geography, exploring the sources of
agglomeration economies and the long run effects of market potential on
economic outcomes in the world economy. The institutions part will focus on
both the theoretical framework of new institutional economics and the role of
state capacity and constraints on the exercise of arbitrary power in particular
economies covering Asia as well as Europe. The Summer School is intended mainly
for PhD students and early postdoctoral researchers in economic history. The
morning sessions will consist of keynote lectures by Nick Crafts (Warwick) and
Sheilagh Ogilvie (Cambridge), with additional lectures by distinguished
speakers including Kerstin Enflo (Lund), James Foreman-Peck (Cardiff), Walker
Hanlon (UCLA), Joan Roses (LSE), and Nikolaus Wolf (Berlin). The afternoon
sessions will consist of presentations by students and postdocs, with feedback
from the lecturers and other participants. Presentations can be on any
aspect of economic history.
Accommodation and meals will be provided free of charge and
economy only travel expenses up to £250 will also be covered. Applications
to attend the Summer School should be sent to Jane Snape at:
Jane.Snape@warwick.ac.uk by 23 April 2017.
Please include the following:
(1) A short CV (maximum one-page) indicating your contact
details and university level education
(2) Contact details for your supervisor, who will be asked to provide a
supporting statement
(3) A short abstract (maximum 500 words) of the research that you would like to
present
Notification of acceptance will be sent out by 11 May 2017.
Call for Papers:
University of Tübingen PhD Summer School Business beyond Businesses: Agency,
Political Economy & Investors, c.1850-1970
20-22 September 2017, Tübingen, Germany.
The University of Tübingen as part of its Institutional
Strategy (ZUK 63) has made available funding for an intensive three-day event
aimed at PhD students in business or economic history or affiliated fields
working on any topic which overlaps with the theme of the school (for more
details, see below). Students will be hosted in the historic town of Tübingen,
and will present, debate and discuss their work-in-progress with leading
international scholars within a world-class university. The school aims to
provide doctoral students with an overview of relevant research and innovative
tools and methodologies in the field in order to sharpen their own research
skills. It is organised jointly by the Seminar für Neuere Geschichte (Tübingen)
and the Centre for Business History in Scotland (University of Glasgow).
The school will take the form of presentations from students
(c.25 minutes) and workshops hosted by established experts in the field. The
aims of the school are: 1) To deepen students’ understanding of current themes
in historical research (and how this can inform their own work). 2) To enhance
research skills through masterclasses on methods for researching and writing
history. 3) To explore the main theoretical underpinnings particular to
business and economic history. 4) To provide a welcoming and convivial
environment in which to discuss their research with leading scholars and peers.
Students will benefit from the experience of academics from
Tübingen and beyond. Our keynote speaker will be Professor Phil Scranton, of
Rutgers University (USA), a world-renowned scholar who has produced numerous
books and articles on many different aspects of modern business and technology.
Other confirmed participants include Professor Patrick Fridenson (EHESS,
France), Professor Ewald Frie (Tübingen), Dr Daniel Menning (Tübingen), and Dr
Christopher Miller (Glasgow).
Funding will cover flights and/or trains (up to an agreed
limit), accommodation, lunches, and the conference meal for up to ten students.
A further ten will be eligible to receive part-funding. There may also be
limited space left-over for those wishing to fully self-fund (or have received
funding from their own institution). Those interested in attending the summer
school should send the documents listed below by e-mail to the organisers Dr
Daniel Menning (Daniel.Menning@uni-tuebingen.de) and Dr Christopher Miller
(Christopher.Miller@glasgow.ac.uk). The deadline for applications is 8 May
2017. A maximum of 20 funded applicants will be selected and notified
shortly afterwards. 1) a brief CV (max two pages) 2) a summary of their PhD
(max two pages); 3) a title/abstract for their desired presentation topic (max
one page). This should incorporate one or more major themes of the student’s
PhD. 4) (desirable) an example of work in progress, e.g. a draft chapter,
article, working paper (preferably in English, German or French – though all
presentations and discussions will be in English).
Further Notes for Applicants:
Overview of scope and aims of school:
(This overview is a guide only. Students working on
similar topics to those listed below are encouraged to speak to Daniel Menning
and/or Christopher Miller in the first instance)
Business history and economic history have been distinct
disciplines, separate from both economics and organizational studies, for over
three-quarters of a century. They have developed a rich and varied
historiography that has helped to answer and contextualize some of the largest
questions of the last two centuries. These include explaining rapid
technological changes of the industrial and information ages, the globalization
of financial and production markets, and, not least, the rise of Capitalism
itself. However, recent trends have in some cases deepened the divide with
‘traditional’ history and historiography. For instance, business history has
often found its natural home in business schools rather than history
departments, while economic history is increasingly undertaken in a highly
quantitative manner in economics, rather than history, faculties. However,
while much work remains to be done to redress the balance, new approaches from
historians are starting to re-bridge the divide. We believe historians engaged
in archival research have much to offer business and economic topics, and it is
work in this area that this summer school intends to foster.
More particularly, the school will examine one of the major
‘problems’ prevalent in the existing literature. Simply put, the firm – that is
the company or organization itself – has been the unit of assessment most
prevalent in business and economic historiography, matched only by overviews of
national economies or government policies. Many historians, economists and
business scholars have made their careers explaining the rise (and fall) of
major corporations, or the successes and failures of a nation’s economy or core
industries. However, while these studies have been immensely valuable, such
narratives of success and/or failure have missed, or not yet fully developed, important
nuances as a result.
We have identified two major issues such nation or
firm-specific studies fail to capture, and have broken them down as follows:
1. Business people regularly move between firms, but they
also move into, influence, or create, organizations outside the world of
private profit-seeking business. These can be linked to politics, government,
the military, education, health care and the environment, philanthropy,
promotion of trade, and/or other pursuits. Their work can transcend state,
national, and continental boundaries, and can influence entire economic
systems. For example, businessmen have advised military production ministries
in Britain during (and between) both World Wars; business leaders collaborated
with municipal authorities on measures to reduce smoke pollution in 19th
century Chicago; and in more recent times have changed the face of private
higher education with multi-million dollar donations to their Alma Mater, and
indirectly have aided the rise of the modern ‘Business School’ itself. Thus,
businessmen seek to influence – though not always for private profit – the
world that their businesses operate in, and this has not often been captured in
existing studies of firms or economies.
2. Similarly, businesses are not only influenced by the
acumen of their managers, by the general state of the economy or by
governmental regulation. With the creation of joint-stock companies, external
private investors entered the field of business, for various reasons and with
myriad motives. Some desired to achieve a permanent stream of income. These
investors’ sentiments became a force that was hard to ignore, as witnessed
during stock market bubbles in England, France and the Netherlands as early as
the 18th century. Technological (and legal) changes after 1860 accelerated
these processes. Some new investors entered the market simply for the thrill
and/or for the financial gains possible by means of speculation, perhaps with
little or no interest in the businesses at all. Nevertheless, this group, often
already wealthy and influential, helped create more volatile markets, and
caused unease among politicians and business people in the process. Moreover,
when such individuals were left as losers following the bursting of the bubbles
they helped create, their complaints were loud and public. In short, the role
of speculation and the attempts to define or limit what kind of investors
should be allowed to enter this world (and, thus,
the world of business) are also important in understanding
the environment beyond the boundary of the firm or nation that businesses
operated in.
Furthermore, while these problems are not completely unique
to the modern world, they acquired greater significance from the second-half of
the 19th century. The second-wave of industrialization after 1850 (primarily in
Britain, Germany, Japan and America) gave birth to larger corporations and
professional management structures, which gradually diminished the role of
wholly family-owned and/or operated firms. In their place, joint stock firms
further proliferated with some (such as General Motors) growing and
transitioning to multi-divisional and multi-national conglomerates by the
1930s. In turn, this allowed for the rise in the wealth and influence of
professional business magnates such as Charles Schwab (Bethlehem Steel), Alfred
Sloan (GM), and others. Simultaneously, technological advances in communication
and technology – from the telegraph to the ticker tape – allowed real-time
transactions and completely transformed stock market speculation, increasing
the number of willing participants and tradable shares dramatically. As such,
the cases of business going beyond the firm or the national boundary multiplied
dramatically from this point, and offer up myriad exciting avenues for
historical research.
Similarly, though in recent times we understand well the
nature of a ‘globalized’ world in which firms and agents transcend company or
national boundaries, the term itself has its roots in the 1970s. The vast
increase in computing power and the equally dramatic decrease in the cost of
aviation in the last forty or so years means we could reasonably understand
this later period as an era unto itself, in much the way the transformation of
firms and speculation was a century earlier. For these reasons, the summer
school plans to concentrate on this particularly volatile century or so of
change, and would invite papers from PhD students working on business and
economic topics broadly defined from roughly 1850 to 1970.
To aid interested students, some of the specific questions
to be addressed in global, national, regional, and comparative contexts might
include the following:
• What constitutes entrepreneurship, innovation or
efficiency outside the context of the private profit-seeking firm?
• How did business people moving into other organizations
change their ways of doing things, and vice versa? How did they attain (and
retain) influence, and have these movements changed over time?
• How have business people and their behavior and attitudes
affected the structures and practices of other organizations or politics?
• How have the interrelationships between business and other
organizations affected the structures, strategies, and practices of the firm?
• How do business leaders use nonprofit-making activities
outside the firm to advance their own entrepreneurial activity through measures
to create good will? What impact have charitable donations from business had on
technologic or scientific development?
• Are some national or regional governance structures,
business networks, more conducive than others to fostering movement and mutual
learning between business and organizations than others, and, if so, why?
• How did politicians and businessmen deal with the
influence of investors on businesses?
• What were the attitudes in business, government and
society towards speculation for pure gain and how did these change over time?
• How were investors with limited or no knowledge in the
world of business supposed to survive or, better even, win money in the world
of the stock exchange?
• How did technology affect the ability of people to get
involved in the world of business?
In sum, this school will on one level explore the
interrelationships between business practice/entrepreneurs and the actors,
organizations, and institutions of the broader social and political
environment. On another, it will study the influence of ‘outsiders’ upon the
wider economy and society, both by means of speculation on the business world
and by the reactions of governments and business community to their actions.
These are very large and important questions which are only
slowly beginning to be tackled by historians, and our hope
is that the summer school will help to map out and better understand spheres of
business beyond the national economies or particular firms, to the benefit not
only of history students, but to show why and how history can benefit the kinds
of studies that have hitherto taken place mainly in economics faculties or
business schools.
