A recent letter
to the editor of our local paper argued that secession and the Civil War
were caused by high tariffs not slavery. The Confederate states were rebelling
against high taxes and big government. Apparently, they were really just Reagan
Republicans or maybe even libertarians (slaveholding libertarians). The author
of the letter made the claim that the South paid 75 percent of the tariff
revenue in 1859. I thought the claim was so outrageous he must have just made it up. It turns
out you can find this claim all over the internet. It turns out it even has
academic credentials behind it. Some people attribute it to Walter
Williams, but he appears to have gotten it from Thomas Di Lorenzo, who
attributed it to Frank Taussig’s The
Tariff History of the United States. Di Lorenzo, however, did not
provide a page citation. I suspect that he did not provide a page citation
because one does not exist. If someone can find this in Taussig please let me
know.
In any case, it is not true that
most revenue came from Southern ports. A small fraction of tariff revenue came
from Southern ports. In 1860 the Secretary of the Treasury reported the amount
of revenue collected in each collection district between 1854 and 1859. (Sen.
Ex. Doc. No. 33 36th Congress 1st Session). Looking at
1857, for instance, one finds that total revenue was $64,171,034. Most of the
revenue, $42,510,753, came as it did every year from a single port: New York.
The most important port in the South was New Orleans, which brought in a little
more than $3 million, less than half as much as Boston. Southern ports were not
even close to being the most important source of revenue.
There is no mystery as to why Southern
states seceded. They issued secession proclamations explaining their actions. South
Carolina was the first to secede, and the state’s proclamation does not mention
tariffs. It is entirely
about the perceived threat to slavery. It declares that
“A geographical line has been drawn across
the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of
a man to the high office of President of the United States, whose opinions and
purposes are hostile to slavery. He is to be entrusted with the administration
of the common Government, because he has declared that that "Government
cannot endure permanently half slave, half free," and that the public mind
must rest in the belief that slavery is in the course of ultimate extinction.”
Apparently we are to believe that they were simply hiding their true
motivation, opposition to tariffs. I wish modern defenders of the Confederacy
were as honest as its original defenders.
No comments:
Post a Comment