Since Kanye West decided that the World had spent enough time
paying attention to people that are not him, I have seen a number of suggestions
for Kanye’s education. More than a few have been along these lines
If he were to read Baptist, Kanye, like many of
Baptist’s other readers, could learn all sorts of things that are not
true. He could learn that
1.
Before Ed Baptist, economists and historians did
not believe that slave owners were profit seeking capitalists. Many
historians and almost all economic historians viewed slavery as a profit
seeking enterprise.
2.
Slave produced cotton accounted for more than
60% of GDP. Baptist
made up numbers and summed them in an approach to national income accounting
that defies all logic.
3.
The pushing system was a term that enslaved
people used. Ed
Baptist made up the term (see section 4.1; on second thought, just read the
whole thing).
4.
Economic historians don’t think slave owners
used violence to coerce enslaved people. This
is simply not true.
5.
Baptist shows that innovations in violence led
to innovations in picking that drove increases in productivity during the
antebellum period. He never provides any
evidence to support one of the central claims of his book. See
the link for the previous point and this by
Pseudoerasmus, and this by Olmstead
and Rhode. I should also mention Trevor
Burnard as one of the first historians to call out Baptist.
If we want Kanye to understand the brutality of slavery, how
about Charles Ball,
or Solomon Northup,
or Harriet Jacobs?
If you think he needs to read some professor, how about Daina
Ramey Berry? Maybe if Kanye gets through these readings we can come up with
some more, but let’s not contribute to the miseducation of Kanye West by
telling him to read Ed Baptist’s terrible book.
P.S. Stop telling anyone to read Ed Baptist!
No comments:
Post a Comment