This is a blog about economics, history, law and other things that interest me.
Sunday, September 21, 2014
The cost of college
Susan Dynarski in the New York Times:
"In 1988, state legislatures gave their public colleges an average of $8,600 a student. Students contributed an additional $2,700 in tuition, which gets us to a total of $11,300. By 2013, states were kicking in just $6,100, while students were contributing $5,400"
The half (maybe a bit more) that Baptist does not tell
The new book by
Edward Baptist The Half Has Never Been
Told has been getting a lot of attention on the internet. More precisely, a
review of the book in The Economist
has been getting a lot of attention.
Amid all the
attention to the Economist’s ridiculous review, the book itself has been
somewhat neglected.
I have not read
the entire book. I have read the parts related to the areas that I am most familiar
with. What I
have read I do not like. On page 129 he writes that “during the late
antebellum years, northern travelers insisted that slave labor was less
efficient than free labor, a point of dogma that most historians and economists
have accepted.” The footnote for this statement does not actually provide any
evidence to support, which is not surprising since you would be hard pressed to
find an economic historian who does accept it. Actually, there have been
surveys of economic historians that show that more than two-thirds would agree
that slave agriculture was efficient relative to non-slave agriculture. It has
been more than a half century since Conrad and Meyer showed that investment in
slaves had a return comparable to other potential investments. As best I can
tell Baptist does not even cite Conrad and Meyer. Fogel and Engerman long ago
argued that slave agriculture was as dynamic a version of capitalism as existed
anywhere in the United States. In awarding the Nobel Prize to Fogel in
1993, the Nobel committee stated that “Fogel showed that the established
opinion that slavery was an ineffective, unprofitable and pre-capitalist
organization was incorrect. The institution did not fall to pieces due to its
economic weakness but collapsed because of political decisions. He showed that
the system, in spite of its inhumanity, had been economically efficient.” How can any of this be reconciled with the claim that most economists and historians and economists accept the dogma that slave labor was less efficient?
To say that
Baptist is knocking down a straw man would be an injustice to straw men.
He suggests
that pretty much everyone has failed to notice that productivity increased on
cotton plantations, but his primary evidence for this is from Olmstead and
Rhode, and, for some reason, he cites their NBER working paper, even though the
paper was published in the Journal of Economic History six years ago. He also
rejects Olmstead and Rhode’s explanation for the productivity increase, which
emphasizes improvement in cotton plants, but he does not address the evidence
that they provided to support of this conclusion (productivity increased much more
in areas that grew varieties of cotton for which new seeds were being developed
than it did in areas where new varieties were not grown). Contrary to what he
seems to suggest Olmstead and Rhode did not simply assume that it must have
been technological change that caused productivity to increase. They went to
considerable effort to rule out other explanations.
This is not
nitpicking. These arguments are at the center of the book. Baptist consistently
misrepresents or ignores the contributions of others, even when it is clear
that he is familiar with their work. The false claims about the book’s
contributions make it difficult to discern if there are any legitimate
contributions.
By the
way, if you are looking to read a good recent book about slavery in the United
States, I would suggest Kathleen Hilliard’s Masters,Slaves and Exchange.
Thursday, September 11, 2014
The Dismal Science
In the Los Angeles Times Hector Tobar writes that "In "The Half Has Never Been Told," Baptist adds many new, stark and essential elements to that story. His most important achievement is to show us how the "dismal science" of economics served to make the lot of slaves even grimmer."
If Baptist were to do this it would be a nice trick. Thomas Carlyle was the one who named economics the dismal science. What did he find dismal about it? He thought it was dismal that economic theory did not provide support for slavery and that economists like John Stuart Mill supported emancipation.
I think there are a number of problems with Baptist's book, but I suspect this quote just reflects Tobar's ignorance.
If Baptist were to do this it would be a nice trick. Thomas Carlyle was the one who named economics the dismal science. What did he find dismal about it? He thought it was dismal that economic theory did not provide support for slavery and that economists like John Stuart Mill supported emancipation.
I think there are a number of problems with Baptist's book, but I suspect this quote just reflects Tobar's ignorance.
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Tuesday, June 24, 2014
The truth about student debt
The Reality of Student Debt in the New York Times
"the share of income that young adults are devoting to loan repayment has remained fairly steady over the last two decades, according to data the Brookings Institutions is releasing on Tuesday. Only 7 percent of young-adult households with education debt have $50,000 or more of it. By contrast, 58 percent of such households have less than $10,000 in debt, and an additional 18 percent have between $10,000 and $20,000."
"the share of income that young adults are devoting to loan repayment has remained fairly steady over the last two decades, according to data the Brookings Institutions is releasing on Tuesday. Only 7 percent of young-adult households with education debt have $50,000 or more of it. By contrast, 58 percent of such households have less than $10,000 in debt, and an additional 18 percent have between $10,000 and $20,000."
Thursday, June 5, 2014
For what shall it profit a university if it shall gain AACSB accreditation and lose its own soul?
Mark Perry argues that the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business is fueling the growth of fraudulent journals by demanding that faculty publish but giving no consideration to where they publish. I am starting believe that he is right.
Friday, February 28, 2014
Evergreen
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/02/28/evergreen-state-colleges-unusual-take-assessment
This sounds like a good idea, but I think the article might
be exaggerating how large a change this is. I graduated from Evergreen in 1984.
For each interdisciplinary program you had to write a self-evaluation and an
evaluation of the program and faculty, and the faculty member that you worked
with wrote an evaluation of you. Each of these evaluations was 2-4 pages.
Written evaluations and serious reflection have always been the norm at
Evergreen. I do, however, think this is a nice addition. It sounds like it asks
students to keep the big picture in mind. It also reminds me a bit of the plans
that my daughter had to do while she was at Bennington.
P.S. I looked at the Evergreen webpage, and it is great to see that Greeners still have the opportunity to work with Tom Rainey and Jeanne Hahn.
HT to Steve Greenlaw
HT to Steve Greenlaw
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Problems with Bitcoin
The New York Times reports that "On Monday night, a number of leading Bitcoin companies jointly announced that Mt. Gox, the largest exchange for most of Bitcoin’s existence, was planning to file for bankruptcy after months of technological problems and what appeared to have been a major theft. A document circulating widely in the Bitcoin world said the company had lost 744,000 Bitcoins in a theft that had gone unnoticed for years. That would be about 6 percent of the 12.4 million Bitcoins in circulation."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)