This is a blog about economics, history, law and other things that interest me.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Economic Theory and Prediction
Interestingly enough, Professor Stout later noted that if you want to get people to behave ina pro-social fashion you need to make sure that the benefits of selfish behavior are not too great.
Monday, November 21, 2011
Three Essays In Search of a Point
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
Trust Companies in the Panic of 1907
His Dark Materials and Economic History
Monday, March 14, 2011
Today in American Economic History
Sunday, March 13, 2011
government granted monoply
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
North and Kuran Video
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Great Stagnation
What I'm Reading
Friday, February 4, 2011
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
college and debt
From "A Lifetime of of Student Debt? Not Likely" By Robin Wilson in the Chronicle of Higher Education
"In fact, despite stories of a large number of students who face gargantuan debt, about a third of graduates leave college with no debt at all for their education. Of the 65 percent who face debt, the average they owe is around $20,000. That's just below the starting price of a 2009 Ford Escape.
"Most people borrow a reasonable amount of money, they pay it back, and they are better for having gone to college," says Mr. McPherson.
But for a vocal minority of borrowers, problems with student-loan debt are very real. About 8 percent of undergraduates borrow at least double the national average.
Why do some students borrow more than $40,000 for a bachelor's degree when average borrowing is only half that? The answer is almost never that they are from very low-income families and need that much money to get a four-year degree. Public four-year colleges charged an average of just $6,585 for in-state tuition and fees in 2008-9. The total cost, including textbooks, room and board, and other living expenses, averages $18,326 a year — and financial aid brings that figure down for many students."
Monday, January 31, 2011
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Immigration and Innovation
Friday, December 3, 2010
North Conference
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Un-Freaknomics?
"In contrast with the authors of bestselling books like Freakonomics, who are fascinated by obscure but intriguing questions like how to detect cheating by sumo wrestlers, Roth relishes real-world challenges." Much of Freakonomics was about crime and education, hardly obscure issues. I liked that Freakonomics presented economists as people who do research to try to find the answers to questions.
The problem with Freakonomics is the marketing, which was successful but dishonest. Graduating from MIT, teaching at Chicago, winning the John Bates Clark Medal, and publishing in top journals are not indicators that one has gone rogue. Exaggerting the novelty of Freakonomics does a disservice to people like Gary Becker, Douglass North and Roger Miller (who tried to sell a version of The Economics of Public Issues under the title of Abortion, Baseball and Weed), Dick McKenzie and Gordon Tullock, and many others.
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
The Neglected Field of Economic History?
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Shaping the American Economy
Friday, July 16, 2010
What I'm Reading
Peter Rousseau "The Market For Bank Stocks and the Rise of Deposit Banking in New York City, 1866-1897" NBER Working Paper 15770
Although not traded as actively on the New York Stock Exchange as they had been in the past, the over-the-counter market for these securities was efficient and the local newspapers quoted bank stock prices on a regular basis. The prices revealed in this market became reliable sources of information about the soundness of these institutions. Most important,
ordinary depositors – mostly those not actually investing in bank stocks – used this information to choose among the options for placing their savings. It is in this way that the market for bank stocks in New York contributed to increased public confidence in the banking system and the observed rise in deposits.