This is just a bunch of videos and a few papers related to the topic of modern economic growth.
For a long time, the Industrial Revolution was the central
concern of economic history. Economic historians attempted to explain why the
people in England began to develop new sources of power (the steam engine) and
ways to replace human effort with mechanical effort, like the spinning jenny. Marxists,
and later institutional economic historians, tended to look earlier for the key
changes.
A good place to start
is the work of Nicholas Crafts and Robert Allen on the Industrial Revolution
Nicholas Crafts Industrialization: Why
Britain Got There First
Robert Allen Why was the
Industrial Revolution British?
and
Recently, several historians have challenged the evidence of
high wages in England, an important element of Allen’s argument
In these videos
Jane Humphries presents one of these challenges and, in doing so, provides a
great description of an economic historian’s use of primary sources.
Marxist’s have longargued that the important transition(from
feudalism to capitalism) took place before the Industrial Revolution, but they argued
with each other about the nature of that transition. See the Dobb-Sweezy Debate
and, later, the Brenner Debate (with worlds systems theorists). Unfortunately, I don’t have any good videos on
this topic.
Institutionalist, like Doug North (a former Marxist), have
also looked for a transformation before the IR.
And after Kenneth Pomeranz published the Great Divergence,
many economic historians began to try to identify more precisely when, where
and why modern economic growth began.
Stephen Broadberry has done interesting work in terms of
both measurement and explanation
The quality of this video is not particularly good Accounting for Divergence
but the paper it is
based on is very readable.
See also
Professor Osamu Saito Growth and Inequality in the Great Divergence
Debate: Mughal India, Stuart England and Tokugawa Japan Compared
Professor Bruce
Campbell "The Great Transition: Climate, Disease
and Society in the 13th and 14th Centuries"
Economic historians
now have to explain both The Great Divergence, between East and West, but also
little divergences within Europe and Asia.
So what explains these divergences. Two popular answers are
institutions and ideas. A lot of these arguments are really matters of
emphasis. Most of the people listed below are interested in both.
Despite what
Deirdre McCloskey might tell you, I can assure you that Doug thought that ideas and
beliefs matter. The first two books I remember him telling me I had to read
were Berger and Luckmann’s Social
Construction of Reality and Alan MacFarlane’s Origins of English Individualism.
Sometimes it is not too clear what the difference between ideas and institutions are. Nevertheless, some emphasize one while others emphasize the other.
So here are some videos emphasizing the role of institutions
Douglass North The Natural State
There are a lot of videos of Doug, but
this one reflects the work he was doing with Barry Weingast and John Wallis. I
also like this interview
that Timur Kuran did with him.
This is a short video with Sheilagh Ogilvie. You can also check out this paper with A.W. Carus on Institutions and Economic Growth
See also (parts of some of these may be a little difficult for non-economists to follow, but stick with it and you will get the main ideas)
Timur Kuran on the Long Divergence: How Islamic
Law Held Back the Middle East
Mark
Koyama Jewish Communities and European City Growth
Eric Chaney The Medieval Origins of
Comparative European Development: Evidence form the Basque Country
Here are some emphasizing the role of ideas
Joel Mokyr Culture of Growth
See also
Deirdre McCloskey Bourgeois Equality: How
Ideas, Not Capital, Enriched the World
Anton
Howes on the Ideology of Innovation from about 15:00 to 35:00
If those don’t work for you maybe you want to consider this
Ashraf and Galor on genetic
diversity and economic growth
Finally, you could just watch this entire course on World Economic
History with Greg Clark
No comments:
Post a Comment