This is a blog about economics, history, law and other things that interest me.
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Claudia Goldin in Saudi Arabia
The New York Times reports on how the economic historian Claudia Goldin tries to help Saudi women enter the labor force while following the prime directive (see paragraph 5).
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
The Fall and Rise of Economic History
Jeremy Adelman and Jonathan Levy describe "The Fall and Rise of Economic History" in the Chronicle of Higher Education
I still hope that economic history will regain a prominent position in both economics and history and that economists and historians will be able to move forward together.
I found this essay particularly interesting because both Jeremy
Adelman and I studied economic history at the LSE in 1984-85. If I
remember correctly, we were the first cohort to do a new M.Sc. program focusing on
Third World economic history. He went on to get his PhD. In history (Oxford); I
went on to get a Ph. D. in economics (Washington University).
I remember a seminar where Jeremy presented the work he was
doing on Argentina. The first person to speak was one of the older professors
in the department, very much a traditional historian. He said, “That is political
history. This is a seminar in economic history.” He then leaned back, laced his
fingers over his stomach, and looked around the room, smiling as if he had just
said all that needed to be said. I know he did not speak for all the professors
present, but it was still a very discouraging moment. Like Jeremy, I was interested
in economic questions but didn’t believe it was possible to leave politics and
ideology out of the answer. I had also just started to read Douglass North’s
work on institutions and ideology and thought it might provide the way forward.
I decided to pursue a degree in economics. Since then, I think economists (for
example, North, Wallis, McCloskey, Mokyr) have continued to make progress in
reintegrating politics, the law, and culture into the study of economic history.
I have, on the other hand, been very disappointed in the “new
history of capitalism” that has arisen in history departments. I first thought
that this might be the moment for a much needed reunion of economists and
historians, but it quickly became clear that that was not what the new history
of capitalism was about. Instead of confronting the work of economists directly
it is generally ignored or dismissed. People throw around terms like homo
economicus, suggesting that economists all think that people care only about
maximizing their material wealth and that they do so with perfect information.
They seem to believe that the recent financial crisis has undermined the
credibility of economic theory because things did not work out well, while a
student in any decent principles of economics class could show you the
prisoners’ dilemma and explain to you that economic models do not all conclude
that everything will work out for the best. The quality of the historical research is
secondary to the author’s stance against capitalism (which is not defined) and
economics.
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Who is shocked by this?
The Economist reports that the performance of state owned enterprises has been shockingly bad.
If there is state capitialism, is there private enterprise socialism?
If there is state capitialism, is there private enterprise socialism?
Thursday, November 27, 2014
Jeffrey Beall Explains Why People Should Avoid "journals" published by the Clute Institute
http://scholarlyoa.com/2014/11/27/why-researchers-should-avoid-the-clute-institute/
"In conclusion, I recommend that honest scholars seek out a better publisher for disseminating their research than the Clute Institute. This publisher, with its dubious claim to be an institute, is little more than a scholarly vanity press — it’s essentially a money press — and publishing papers in this publisher’s journals may hurt authors in the long run. By this I mean that for any researcher who publishes a paper in a Clute Institute journal, that paper will be in the company of other papers with highly questionable citation and authorship practices and may be damaged by association."
"In conclusion, I recommend that honest scholars seek out a better publisher for disseminating their research than the Clute Institute. This publisher, with its dubious claim to be an institute, is little more than a scholarly vanity press — it’s essentially a money press — and publishing papers in this publisher’s journals may hurt authors in the long run. By this I mean that for any researcher who publishes a paper in a Clute Institute journal, that paper will be in the company of other papers with highly questionable citation and authorship practices and may be damaged by association."
Wednesday, November 26, 2014
What Was Funny?
Huffington reports on how the Board of Visitors of UVA deal with the problem of sexual asault on campus:
"Later, however, as the meeting neared its third hour, board member Edward D. Miller interrupted to note the Visitors were laughing too much for a session dedicated to such a serious issue. Miller commented through a conference call, as he was not able to be there in person. His comment was quietly applauded by public audience members."
"Later, however, as the meeting neared its third hour, board member Edward D. Miller interrupted to note the Visitors were laughing too much for a session dedicated to such a serious issue. Miller commented through a conference call, as he was not able to be there in person. His comment was quietly applauded by public audience members."
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Kudos to Cabell's
Cabell's is taking a stand against fake journals:
"Unfortunately, academic publishing has been rife with fraudulent procedures over the past several years. Instances of deceptive practices and outright fraud have skyrocketed. Understandably, this has led to a significant erosion of trust in the scholarly publication process. In an effort to offer our users guidance and to support our mission of providing academics with accurate information and reputable outlets for publication, Cabell’s has launched a reevaluation initiative whereby selected journals appearing in our Directories will be examined according to new, more stringent criteria on a rotating basis throughout the year. Journals are selected for reevaluation based on inclusion in Jeffery Beall’s 2014 List of Predatory Publishers, exclusion from DOAJ and/or OASPA, and not meeting requirements of the Cabell’s Selection Policy. As these selected journals undergo this reevaluation process, they will be removed from our database. Essentially, these journals will be reapplying for inclusion. Journals will be evaluated according to the Cabell’s Selection Policy. Each journal’s editor or publisher will be asked to complete a new Application for Inclusion. Our Journal Admissions Department will verify that all journals reapplying for inclusion meet the required criteria. This comprehensive reevaluation process is expected to be completed by the end of 2015."
"Unfortunately, academic publishing has been rife with fraudulent procedures over the past several years. Instances of deceptive practices and outright fraud have skyrocketed. Understandably, this has led to a significant erosion of trust in the scholarly publication process. In an effort to offer our users guidance and to support our mission of providing academics with accurate information and reputable outlets for publication, Cabell’s has launched a reevaluation initiative whereby selected journals appearing in our Directories will be examined according to new, more stringent criteria on a rotating basis throughout the year. Journals are selected for reevaluation based on inclusion in Jeffery Beall’s 2014 List of Predatory Publishers, exclusion from DOAJ and/or OASPA, and not meeting requirements of the Cabell’s Selection Policy. As these selected journals undergo this reevaluation process, they will be removed from our database. Essentially, these journals will be reapplying for inclusion. Journals will be evaluated according to the Cabell’s Selection Policy. Each journal’s editor or publisher will be asked to complete a new Application for Inclusion. Our Journal Admissions Department will verify that all journals reapplying for inclusion meet the required criteria. This comprehensive reevaluation process is expected to be completed by the end of 2015."
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
More on the History of Capitalism
Tom Cutterham has a post at the Junto about both the recent Shenk essay in The Nation and the discussion in the recent issue of Journal of American History.
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Saturday, November 1, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)